the Hive BB
  Crystal Meth
  Sodium Laurel Sulphate...Aaaaaggghhh

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Sodium Laurel Sulphate...Aaaaaggghhh
CHEMMAN
Member
posted 09-25-1999 12:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Have experimented with Australian Sudafeds
and generics.The Sudafed are the hardest.
Wash thru a sand filter with methanol or water,and get a clear liquid.Problem is when
you evap, greenish slimy soap got thru,.By tests,sodium laurel sulphate dissolves in water,methanol,diethyl ether,DCM,BUT ONLY SLIGHTLY IN TOLUENE.Enough to be a pain in the ass in an a/b extraction.It sits in the middle and around the toluene layer on the glass ,and you have to throw away some toluene to try to get clean product.How does a bee beat a bipolarish shit like this.I even filtered some toluene/freebase thru the sand filter and guess what,....The fucking soap slime went thru the thing!!But run a pill extraction with methanol thru the sand filter and all methyl cellulose is gone as expected.Howcome this shit gets thru even in toluene which it hates ,and how do you beet it?????????????????/..Frustrated but never beaten

newbee boy
Member
posted 09-25-1999 01:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for newbee boy     
NB> In search of pure psuedo ephedrine crystals by the kilo!!
Its not what you know....!!!
NB>out

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 09-25-1999 01:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Way to go fellow bee,but id sure like to beat this stuff for scientific reasons!!how did it effect your product?any perfumy smell in your freebase?It goes right thru and is a real bitch.I dont think its been encountered in the US yet as havent heard any refs!!

newbee boy
Member
posted 09-25-1999 01:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for newbee boy     
Yes I think it went all the way thru and probably hindered reaction alot. I have invested too much $$$ on reagents and shit to be able to stuff around. I will look for some pure pseudo and continue.
NB>out

Stonium
Member
posted 09-25-1999 10:07 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Stonium     
Don't know if it will help or not, but here is info from Merck for this stuff:

8782. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate.
Sulfuric acid monododecyl ester sodium salt; sodium dodecyl sulfate; SDS; Irium. C12H25NaO4S;
mol wt 288.38. C 49.98%, H 8.74%, Na 7.97%, O 22.19%, S 11.12%. CH3(CH2)10CH2OSO3Na.
 Anionic detergent prepd by sulfation of lauryl alcohol, followed by neutralization with sodium
carbonate: A. Lottermoser, F. Stoll, Kolloid-Z. 63, 50 (1933). Surfactant properties: J. Powney,
C. C. Addison, Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 1244 (1937); E. E. Dreger et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. 36, 610
(1944). Use in electrophoretic sepn and mol wt estimation of proteins: A. L. Shapiro et al.,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 28, 815 (1967); K. Weber, M. Osborn, J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4406
(1969); of glycopolypeptides: B. S. Leach et al., Biochemistry 19, 5734 (1980). Toxicity study:
A. I. T. Walker et al., Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 5, 763 (1967). Review of toxicology: Ch.
Gloxhuber, Arch. Toxicol. 32, 245-270 (1974).
 White or cream-colored crystals, flakes, or powder. Faint odor of fatty substances. Smooth
feel. Neutral reaction. One gram dissolves in 10 ml water, giving an opalescent soln. Lowers the
surface tension of aq solns. Emulsifies fats. LD50 orally in rats: 1288 mg/kg (Walker).

 USE: Wetting agent, detergent, esp in the textile industry. Electrophoretic separation of
proteins and lipids. Ingredient of toothpastes.
========================

Over/Out,
Stonium

Worlock
Member
posted 09-25-1999 11:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Worlock     
A couple of stray thoughts,

If SLS is only slightly soluble in Toluene , then it will be even less soluble in cold toluene. This may allow you to mix a cold alkaline aqueous solution of the soap and ephedrine with cold toluene and separate.

SLS may be possible to isolate it in a middle layer between the polar and nonpolar using warm toluene, and slightly acidic water after shaking well, by making the solution slightly acidic. Ephedrine will be highly water soluble. SLS will be more soluble in the toluene.

If you must toss out some toluene to get rid of thr SLS then make your solution dilute and the loss od E will be negligable.

All most every extraction results in some loss of product. Comparing price of meth $50gm to E $2gm some loss of E is acceptable.
It is better to loose some E from the extraction process, than to have it not turn over in your reaction.

FMAN
Member
posted 10-01-1999 11:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
electro the shit clean will not pass go will not collect two hundred dollars.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...acid and basing will kill it off eventually it looses half you must now adopt the solution of continious feed and microscale factory.>>>>>>>.NO other solutions!

The sassage skin gots stuff in there use fish guts for all I care ever seen this stuff stretchy stuff huhg?

Note that one layer is insidde and the other is outside experiment with different ideas such as extraction through plastic baggies???

Anyways solvent stuff really sucks sucks sucks it taste shitty and all that too

Only the best will do did ya ever wonder what the PH of Propane was or maybe some CO2 and Propane mixxed Do you know wich addatives are added to which gasses and at what concentraation?? Thought so see they do teach people in school how to teach themselves they are only there to assist you cant make a good dr it takes spirit man to make something gooder.

Ya mix ya stuff with all kinds a shit a there are plenty enough procedures dealt here allready I must be moving to another board, um ya

Anyways fuck the salt up the ass it sucks NACL unless for ellectro give up the salt alltogether there are so many easier ways to titrate a solution and so many things are so much better than accitone and shit like is nasty shit taste shitty and sucks raw dick

Anyways do learn how to transform products from electrolysis learn the right solvent I am supprised you most of you get anything at all from the product and your commitment to finding a simple recipe, there is on and if I said there was gold over the on that mountain they wouldent look neither, unless I dig up a dead indian and display it for halloween, compleete with the pagamas

So understand a solvent layer ing effect
You can manipulate all kinds a shit and I hope they do illegalize the pills and solvents for all I care this is a great thing for us because then the uneducated swine got nothing but the besst of the best and I am talking some nity gritty shit that is so slick you are gona slip and slide all over the shit because I aint neither gona play nice no more and you are gona have to impress me with your input and creativity or I'll write a fucking book and pass it out for near pennies, well actually nothing at all cause it didnt cost me anything

The hive is cool and all it did the job for me but it is on a lame end and most all have either gain eledification for there pursuit or have been well have not been busy in the maner I would think or would aspire them to be to become in the mind and all

Frankly I dont like amny people and especially someone who thinks they can make a buck or something off my ideas, this is not for money this is for the mass of goodereers or anyone who thinks they got a good reason to do it. Fine get busy and get spun and all ya like untill you wear yourself out feeding this stuff like exotic ciggeretes to our communities is not helping one bit and the war on drugs has only done one thing in my opinion,,,,,,,,,,,,prejudice of meterialistic pig basterd in need of some gossip or action something to be aggainst

man did ya ever read about people figure out what they problems are before having to think what the problem was as everybody starts kicking your ass all over for ever angle and all that, yes this is commonplace people are the main problem, but it is all ok and the are book religious ones even like the BOOK or whatever it is BIBLE is mine and it tells of all kinds of problems people have and have had and it is told of the problem so that you will be prepared for relaity, people are not nice, not honest, hate themselves and otheres,,etc The book is about problems so that you can figure them out before it is to late and the too late part is realizing suddenly forgetting you got any problem at all cause then you are dead a living zombie is what ya become, I think a fool goes out into the forest whith a buch of gear and sets up camp with zipwires and such a real pro sets up several camps keeps on the move and puts treasure back were it belongs in the ground dirt dig it up burry it deep etc you are exploring for gopeeres or something??????

FMAN
Member
posted 10-01-1999 11:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
It the soap should form a slight emulsion between methycloride and water add more water and suck it of the portion with the emulsion dry it and enjoy, then just dehydrate solution for removal of one thing there really aint that many I personally think the manufactures dont appreciate uncle sam or the other uppity administrators and all what really pisses them off is when it gets real messy rember spider eggs in bubble yum?

FMAN
Member
posted 10-02-1999 12:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
the key word is sulfate you think it was used for which procedure in the process and how much is there and what happens after removal of and idjestion, cold it be a seperation technique and electro play in the formation of the good elixer before today??

Um it seems very possible you are onto something very interesting indeed bacause it is this portion I find most interesting of all

prickleberry
Member
posted 10-02-1999 08:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for prickleberry     
Prickleberry has used australian sudafeds on the odd occasion for chemistry purposes. The SLS doesn't cause prickleberry much trouble, because he uses a different separation technique.

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 10-02-1999 07:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Prickleberry.Dont hold back man!!!!Tell us about your technique!!!!

FMAN
Member
posted 10-02-1999 11:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
I hate to mention the possiblility but I think the goods are placed into the final workup into the pills in the solution the soap and getgo is together added to the ????
I cant seem to get anything without sucking off the emul;sion with everything except the water layer, seriously I think the stuff is in the junk????
---Amethystium---

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 10-03-1999 05:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Yes Fman I do believe the stuff retains the goods.Throwing out the emulsion= throwing away goods.At least the sand filter seperates out MCC.

FMAN
Member
posted 10-03-1999 04:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
there aint a chance in the world I am puting my stuff through the sand filter as proposed

me would extract through a wick if needed but the only thing that works good is the ellectrogut thing, the gut is filled with stuff and tied shut depending on situation the microfibrils can be coerced to precipate by salting in with say maybe al foil in the solvent will work along the process some time ago, seems very few tried it????

My yield was up when ussing the or the quality of the yield was up and when I quite experimenting with al foil the yield and quality went down, the procedure is listed in the hive awards in the couch area, oh I used a laser to heat the solutio this was added to the comentary later as I attempted to repeate the process several times, I finally figured out what the catalyst was, although I still cant figure if the stuff rises on the ice cube thing is even better???

The gogo seems to be in the soap part???

The gogo seems to rise out on top of an ice cube????

the gogo is still real sulphy and taste like battery acid it dries my eyes out and there is no other precident except to make the product last for ever or nearly so, I really think they should tell the cunsumer how to rid the product of this garbage!

---Amethystium---

FMAN
Member
posted 10-03-1999 04:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
repeate:::::::::::::::::::

the soap seems to have the active ingredient entrained at a high persentage!

wen chilled the soap rises out of the solution if treated properly????

it did for me????

---Amethystium---

prickleberry
Member
posted 10-04-1999 08:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for prickleberry     
Using a sand filter ?? What a stupid idea !! Whats wrong with filter paper and a little vacuum ? My method is nothing special , just logical . Very briefly......

1-Water extraction ----->fiter.
2-Basify ----> filter .
3-Add freebase to acetone.
4-Gas with HCl.

prickleberry
Member
posted 10-04-1999 08:10 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for prickleberry     
You can add more steps if this isn't pure enough for you, like recrystalise.

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 10-05-1999 02:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Thanks Prickleberry and all.Will certainly
try your method The bipolar thingy has caused me lots of grief.I have been able to reduce it but not completely eradicate it

FMAN
Member
posted 10-05-1999 03:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
dilution is the key...

the soap is isolated in concentrated solution it is not sucked of though a high percent of goods may be caught in the soap

then it is dried and then a bunch of solution is added, the trick is to keep layering it so it cant rise as it gets stuck

you will see this is only one contaminant causing XTYL problem it is easy to see the contaminant this soap>>>>means no problem

the microcellulose can be caused to plane like a compass point and it will filter upside down tho the ellectro is supperior for removing this as at superpotential the product acts as slush in solution

repeated ellectrocrystalizations will rid this compleatly of microcelluloses

1 soap
2 microcellulose
3 metaloids
4 waste of crystalization
5 si or dirt
6 wax
7 binder
8 buffer pH
9 i dont see anything else comong through it is pure and clean
10 Iodine is ellectro gasses

dwarfer
Member
posted 10-05-1999 09:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dwarfer     
Well, everybody gets their favorite way going and more power to them:

I have not had the honor to meet sodium laurel sulphate, so my advice is somewhat
spurious and uneducated.

Worlock's advice about coldness is something I would try. It's easy to put in the freezer and see what happens: it's been known to coalesce some other evil additives.

Further, and this is true for several OTC's I've experimented with:

do not use water, use alcohols for the original grinding and mixing and basifying etc.

Alcohols have a quality of not being subject to bufferring actions like water: I think that several of the additives depend greatly on ionic combinations with the water to entrain or otherwise mess with the extraction.

Mixed alcohols and xylene are my preferred two solvents: and they HAVE to go in the freezer to differentiate.

Maybe alky's and colemen's would work too.

Do not overlook the Fman's references to electroseparation: supported by the Stonium(kiss!) contribution about it's usage in electrophoresis.

Please try the non-water and freezer method on a sample: I'd be really interested in the result.

Thanks,
dwarfer

dwarfer
Member
posted 10-05-1999 09:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dwarfer     
Geeze, Prickleberry: if you do not think you have a use for the sandtrap don't use it!

But it is not a stupid idea for some who have tried it.

dwarfer

FMAN
Member
posted 10-05-1999 10:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
Needless not to say that a buffering agent is totaly useless at the voltage of say 12v this creates an overpotential and any buffering agent is buffered infinatly???

Anyways the buffer agent you need to work about causes a contact explosive when ya try to clean the product of iodine with sodium thiosulphate and then give it ammoni or something like the ammine

Then mysterious fires start in the night in the stash baggie real cool hugh????

CHEM GUY
Member
posted 10-05-1999 11:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEM GUY     
Since sodium lauryl sulphate is a pretty large molecule:

CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2-SO4-Na

I would try to get rid of the Na, at least, to destroy this molecule's ability to dissolve in water.
With the orginal pills I would acid treat them with HCl, and wash with toluene, or a high weight alcohol non-miscible with water. The HCl treatment would do one of two things:

C12H25-SO4-Na + HCl --> C12H25-SO4-H + NaCl

Or

C12H25-SO4-Na + HCl + H-OH --> C12H25-OH + NaCl + H-SO4-H

I beleive that C12H25-SO4-H and lauryl alcohol are both insouble in water.

Does everything look in order?

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 10-06-1999 06:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Thanks to all for contributions.Yes Dwarfer you are right.Did a Worlockian acetone wash,and then dissolved in methanol.Cooled in the fridge and then vacuum filtered.Basified to 12 eventually,and added solvent.This is the cleanest ive ever had.no more suds.Just a whole heap of sludge caught in the buchner.The methanol works brilliant,and so does the preliminary acetone wash.
Prickleberry I believe your method works to , and I intend on trying it.Thanks for your input also.I suggest you try this way as well.
The method I think I will try for now is ;
grind em up,hot acetone wash,dissolve in methanol,cool in the fridge,vaccuum buchner,then sand filter and evaporate for hopefully super clean E HCl..Any thoughts?
FMAN thanks for your input I have a lot to learn yet about the electro stuff,but respect its validity.Thanks all

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 10-06-1999 07:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Chemguy you have proposed a very worthy idea
react the thing at the beginning and dispose
of its water solubility.I will try this as well and will post results.I find beating these obstacles more of a thrill and learning experience than producing any drug which I have never done Do you think heating or reflux would be necessary?

FMAN
Member
posted 10-06-1999 09:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
The soap may prove to be a use full agent in ellectro processing, I find it hard to belive yoall would even hesitate to form the salt through the ellectro, all the steps are there it really dont even need filtering or nothing, just divided ellectro control of evacuate gass and collection an dmixxing etcetcetc, I learn long time ago making hash and such goods that solvent really gots a lame conclusion and the methods are like historicial this is what I will leave a history of the method you must master the thing and pass on what ya found this I am finnishing up fell accomplished in the pass and the future awaits new discovery, good luck all God Bless
---A010---

FMAN
Member
posted 10-06-1999 09:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FMAN     
Producing drugs for legitimat treatment is not wrong nor illegal if you go about it propperly, try busting the inhaler open and running through ellectro youll end up with Hydroxide amphetamine salt the free base?

Anyways repeated ellectroXTYLazations will purify your product as well as influence it permenant structure such as oxidation and reduction, it will work U can be shure after ya have mastered the thing it will work very well for all kinds of reactions and purifications. This is the last phase of my commiunication efforts...

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 10-07-1999 07:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Dwarfer twas a great dream The methanol pull
first sorted it all out.Acetone certainly
dissolves wax but I will still do the water
pull .This worked far better than starting with water like the manufacturers wanted you to .Thanx to all

Uncle Fester
Junior Member
posted 10-08-1999 08:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Uncle Fester     
The method I have come to like in dealing with fucked up shit pills is basically this. Grind pills in blender. Take ground pill mass and add a saturated solutionof NaOH in methanol to it until a light paste is achieved. This is lye dissolved in HEET gasline deicer. Grind a bit more for 20 minutes to freebase. Add Coleman Camper fuel to mix, about 2 ml per pill, maybe less, stir for 15 minutes, filter. Add more Coleman Camper fuel to pill mass and stir some more, filter. This gives a naptha solution of free base. It can then be bubbled with HCl to give hydrochloride, or added to liquid ammonia for lithium reduction. If electric reduction is to be done with this material, the HCl salt after thorough drying should be added to a little water, then free based and extracted with toluene. The toluene extract is then bubbled with HCl to give very pure extract.

prickleberry
Member
posted 10-08-1999 11:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for prickleberry     
Dwarfer; If sand filter works for you , great. But filter paper works fine for me. We'll haveto agree to differ on this one....big deal !!
PS...Hows the electro dwarfer/fester bomb going? I don't think I could have possibly chosen a worse reduction method if I tried !! Ever heard of the easy way ??
Prickleberry over and out..

CHEMMAN
Member
posted 10-09-1999 11:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CHEMMAN     
Thanx fester.Is this the method on your
video. I am waiting on its arrival.Does this deal with guifenasin??

Uncle Fester
Junior Member
posted 10-10-1999 02:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Uncle Fester     
It certainly does deal effectively with guifenesin. That's the reason why Coleman Camper Fuel was used as extractant. It doesn't dissolve guifenesin.

The Alchemist
Member
posted 10-10-1999 03:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Alchemist     
What about dissolving guaifenessin w/ chloroform? Merck lists that chloroform will dissolve guaifenessin but NOT ephedrine•HCl. Would washing pills w/ chloroform, filter, wash with cold dH2O, filter then evaporate the water give nice ephedrine•HCl crystals?

peace out...

dwarfer
Member
posted 10-10-1999 07:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dwarfer     
UF, your technique is one I have quacked like a duck about for a while: your weight may well cause some to give it a go.

The only thing I would say is that I have not found it necessary to use methanol: the mixed alcohols from the hardware store seem to work fine.

The blender beats the hell out of dry grinding: separation of MCC can be effected by the sand trap that Prickleberry abhors: or as you said you can go ahead and saturate the alcohol with NaOH.

However, being the lazy guy I am I usually just more or less hang the pH sensor in the corner while the blender is on low, and add NaOH prill by prill until I get to 12 or 13: and then add an excess of NP and separate.

I have used xylene, and separate in the freezer, and find a lot of other gunk (like povidone) agglomerating under the influence of coldness. However, the Coleman's might do similarly, and with the advantage of discriminating against the guaifenesin,

========================

A friend of mine and I were discoursing about the use of charcoal lighter fluid the other day. I hypothesized that charcoal lighter fluids would have no reason not to include lighter parafin waxes in their blend: whereas Coleman's and similar would not include them because of the possibility of clogging the small orifices of some of the types of stoves that use them.

===============================

Prickleberry, I have done no illegal acts for several weeks due to local circumstances.

However, although you disparage the electro way, UF's seminal posting (actually the TRUE 1st interest posting was in ADC 2 years ago with the Hg cathode)

you will see it rise again like a Phx from the ashes of disdain.

The Lone Ranger presurized technique is pretty simple, and as good as the ZnCl2 as far as quality, which is better than the best glacial acetic technique that I have done at least:

but Chem Guy's Urushibara appears to me to be waiting for me to get back in action: which is both a surprise and a disappointment to me, it being so damn simple in concept anyway.

Maybe I'm missing something.

=====================

UF, you wre apparently "out of action" on vacation or something

when I posted greetings to you from an old friend.

\/\/AR]-[AMMER sends his regards!

dwarfer

prickleberry
Member
posted 10-11-1999 09:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for prickleberry     
Greetings dwarfer, prickleberry is pleased to see you still promoting your sand filter. Its good that you weren't discouraged by my last posting, which sounded over critical upon later reading. Do you have an endless supply of ephedrine or something ?? Or are you doing a thesis on all the possible reduction methods under the sun.Well, heres another benzyl alcohol reduction you may not have heard of.
-Tin reduction of pseudoephedrine, Generally, add SnCl2 to some dry ether. then some NaBH4 to reduce it back to elemental tin, after ten minutes add your chloro-pseudoephedrine and stir for 12 hours, extract by filtering then by usual A/B extraction methods. Yields methamphetamine in about the 75-80% range from the chloro step.

LONG LIVE UNCLE FESTER !!! Is this the real uncle fester ?? If it is then g'day from Prickleberry. I love your work !!

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | the Hive

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.