| Author |
Topic: Sodium Laurel
Sulphate...Aaaaaggghhh |
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 09-25-1999 12:53 AM
Have experimented with Australian Sudafeds and generics.The Sudafed are
the hardest. Wash thru a sand filter with methanol or water,and get a
clear liquid.Problem is when you evap, greenish slimy soap got
thru,.By tests,sodium laurel sulphate dissolves in water,methanol,diethyl
ether,DCM,BUT ONLY SLIGHTLY IN TOLUENE.Enough to be a pain in the ass in
an a/b extraction.It sits in the middle and around the toluene layer on
the glass ,and you have to throw away some toluene to try to get clean
product.How does a bee beat a bipolarish shit like this.I even filtered
some toluene/freebase thru the sand filter and guess what,....The fucking
soap slime went thru the thing!!But run a pill extraction with methanol
thru the sand filter and all methyl cellulose is gone as expected.Howcome
this shit gets thru even in toluene which it hates ,and how do you beet
it?????????????????/..Frustrated but never beaten
|
newbee
boy Member |
posted 09-25-1999 01:01 AM
NB> In search of pure psuedo ephedrine crystals by the kilo!! Its
not what you know....!!! NB>out
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 09-25-1999 01:11 AM
Way to go fellow bee,but id sure like to beat this stuff for scientific
reasons!!how did it effect your product?any perfumy smell in your
freebase?It goes right thru and is a real bitch.I dont think its been
encountered in the US yet as havent heard any refs!!
|
newbee
boy Member |
posted 09-25-1999 01:14 AM
Yes I think it went all the way thru and probably hindered reaction alot.
I have invested too much $$$ on reagents and shit to be able to stuff
around. I will look for some pure pseudo and continue. NB>out
|
Stonium Member |
posted 09-25-1999 10:07 AM
Don't know if it will help or not, but here is info from Merck for this
stuff:
8782. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate. Sulfuric acid monododecyl ester
sodium salt; sodium dodecyl sulfate; SDS; Irium. C12H25NaO4S; mol
wt 288.38. C 49.98%, H 8.74%, Na 7.97%, O 22.19%, S 11.12%.
CH3(CH2)10CH2OSO3Na. Anionic detergent prepd by sulfation of lauryl
alcohol, followed by neutralization with sodium carbonate: A.
Lottermoser, F. Stoll, Kolloid-Z. 63, 50 (1933). Surfactant properties: J.
Powney, C. C. Addison, Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 1244 (1937); E. E.
Dreger et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. 36, 610 (1944). Use in electrophoretic
sepn and mol wt estimation of proteins: A. L. Shapiro et al., Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 28, 815 (1967); K. Weber, M. Osborn, J. Biol. Chem.
244, 4406 (1969); of glycopolypeptides: B. S. Leach et al.,
Biochemistry 19, 5734 (1980). Toxicity study: A. I. T. Walker et al.,
Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 5, 763 (1967). Review of toxicology: Ch.
Gloxhuber, Arch. Toxicol. 32, 245-270 (1974). White or
cream-colored crystals, flakes, or powder. Faint odor of fatty substances.
Smooth feel. Neutral reaction. One gram dissolves in 10 ml water,
giving an opalescent soln. Lowers the surface tension of aq solns.
Emulsifies fats. LD50 orally in rats: 1288 mg/kg (Walker).
USE: Wetting agent, detergent, esp in the textile industry.
Electrophoretic separation of proteins and lipids. Ingredient of
toothpastes. ========================
Over/Out, Stonium
|
Worlock Member |
posted 09-25-1999 11:58 AM
A couple of stray thoughts,
If SLS is only slightly soluble in Toluene , then it will be even less
soluble in cold toluene. This may allow you to mix a cold alkaline aqueous
solution of the soap and ephedrine with cold toluene and separate.
SLS may be possible to isolate it in a middle layer between the polar
and nonpolar using warm toluene, and slightly acidic water after shaking
well, by making the solution slightly acidic. Ephedrine will be highly
water soluble. SLS will be more soluble in the toluene.
If you must toss out some toluene to get rid of thr SLS then make your
solution dilute and the loss od E will be negligable.
All most every extraction results in some loss of product. Comparing
price of meth $50gm to E $2gm some loss of E is acceptable. It is
better to loose some E from the extraction process, than to have it not
turn over in your reaction.
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-01-1999 11:13 PM
electro the shit clean will not pass go will not collect two hundred
dollars.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>...acid
and basing will kill it off eventually it looses half you must now adopt
the solution of continious feed and microscale
factory.>>>>>>>.NO other solutions!
The sassage skin gots stuff in there use fish guts for all I care ever
seen this stuff stretchy stuff huhg?
Note that one layer is insidde and the other is outside experiment with
different ideas such as extraction through plastic baggies???
Anyways solvent stuff really sucks sucks sucks it taste shitty and all
that too
Only the best will do did ya ever wonder what the PH of Propane was or
maybe some CO2 and Propane mixxed Do you know wich addatives are added to
which gasses and at what concentraation?? Thought so see they do teach
people in school how to teach themselves they are only there to assist you
cant make a good dr it takes spirit man to make something gooder.
Ya mix ya stuff with all kinds a shit a there are plenty enough
procedures dealt here allready I must be moving to another board, um ya
Anyways fuck the salt up the ass it sucks NACL unless for ellectro give
up the salt alltogether there are so many easier ways to titrate a
solution and so many things are so much better than accitone and shit like
is nasty shit taste shitty and sucks raw dick
Anyways do learn how to transform products from electrolysis learn the
right solvent I am supprised you most of you get anything at all from the
product and your commitment to finding a simple recipe, there is on and if
I said there was gold over the on that mountain they wouldent look
neither, unless I dig up a dead indian and display it for halloween,
compleete with the pagamas
So understand a solvent layer ing effect You can manipulate all
kinds a shit and I hope they do illegalize the pills and solvents for all
I care this is a great thing for us because then the uneducated swine got
nothing but the besst of the best and I am talking some nity gritty shit
that is so slick you are gona slip and slide all over the shit because I
aint neither gona play nice no more and you are gona have to impress me
with your input and creativity or I'll write a fucking book and pass it
out for near pennies, well actually nothing at all cause it didnt cost me
anything
The hive is cool and all it did the job for me but it is on a lame end
and most all have either gain eledification for there pursuit or have been
well have not been busy in the maner I would think or would aspire them to
be to become in the mind and all
Frankly I dont like amny people and especially someone who thinks they
can make a buck or something off my ideas, this is not for money this is
for the mass of goodereers or anyone who thinks they got a good reason to
do it. Fine get busy and get spun and all ya like untill you wear yourself
out feeding this stuff like exotic ciggeretes to our communities is not
helping one bit and the war on drugs has only done one thing in my
opinion,,,,,,,,,,,,prejudice of meterialistic pig basterd in need of some
gossip or action something to be aggainst
man did ya ever read about people figure out what they problems are
before having to think what the problem was as everybody starts kicking
your ass all over for ever angle and all that, yes this is commonplace
people are the main problem, but it is all ok and the are book religious
ones even like the BOOK or whatever it is BIBLE is mine and it tells of
all kinds of problems people have and have had and it is told of the
problem so that you will be prepared for relaity, people are not nice, not
honest, hate themselves and otheres,,etc The book is about problems so
that you can figure them out before it is to late and the too late part is
realizing suddenly forgetting you got any problem at all cause then you
are dead a living zombie is what ya become, I think a fool goes out into
the forest whith a buch of gear and sets up camp with zipwires and such a
real pro sets up several camps keeps on the move and puts treasure back
were it belongs in the ground dirt dig it up burry it deep etc you are
exploring for gopeeres or something??????
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-01-1999 11:16 PM
It the soap should form a slight emulsion between methycloride and water
add more water and suck it of the portion with the emulsion dry it and
enjoy, then just dehydrate solution for removal of one thing there really
aint that many I personally think the manufactures dont appreciate uncle
sam or the other uppity administrators and all what really pisses them off
is when it gets real messy rember spider eggs in bubble yum?
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-02-1999 12:11 AM
the key word is sulfate you think it was used for which procedure in the
process and how much is there and what happens after removal of and
idjestion, cold it be a seperation technique and electro play in the
formation of the good elixer before today??
Um it seems very possible you are onto something very interesting
indeed bacause it is this portion I find most interesting of all

|
prickleberry Member |
posted 10-02-1999 08:05 AM
Prickleberry has used australian sudafeds on the odd occasion for
chemistry purposes. The SLS doesn't cause prickleberry much trouble,
because he uses a different separation technique.
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 10-02-1999 07:14 PM
Prickleberry.Dont hold back man!!!!Tell us about your technique!!!!
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-02-1999 11:46 PM
I hate to mention the possiblility but I think the goods are placed into
the final workup into the pills in the solution the soap and getgo is
together added to the ???? I cant seem to get anything without sucking
off the emul;sion with everything except the water layer, seriously I
think the stuff is in the junk???? ---Amethystium---
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 10-03-1999 05:01 AM
Yes Fman I do believe the stuff retains the goods.Throwing out the
emulsion= throwing away goods.At least the sand filter seperates out
MCC.
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-03-1999 04:48 PM
there aint a chance in the world I am puting my stuff through the sand
filter as proposed
me would extract through a wick if needed but the only thing that works
good is the ellectrogut thing, the gut is filled with stuff and tied shut
depending on situation the microfibrils can be coerced to precipate by
salting in with say maybe al foil in the solvent will work along the
process some time ago, seems very few tried it????
My yield was up when ussing the or the quality of the yield was up and
when I quite experimenting with al foil the yield and quality went down,
the procedure is listed in the hive awards in the couch area, oh I used a
laser to heat the solutio this was added to the comentary later as I
attempted to repeate the process several times, I finally figured out what
the catalyst was, although I still cant figure if the stuff rises on the
ice cube thing is even better???
The gogo seems to be in the soap part???
The gogo seems to rise out on top of an ice cube????
the gogo is still real sulphy and taste like battery acid it dries my
eyes out and there is no other precident except to make the product last
for ever or nearly so, I really think they should tell the cunsumer how to
rid the product of this garbage!
---Amethystium---
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-03-1999 04:50 PM
repeate:::::::::::::::::::
the soap seems to have the active ingredient entrained at a high
persentage!
wen chilled the soap rises out of the solution if treated properly????
it did for me????
---Amethystium---
|
prickleberry Member |
posted 10-04-1999 08:08 AM
Using a sand filter ?? What a stupid idea !! Whats wrong with filter paper
and a little vacuum ? My method is nothing special , just logical . Very
briefly......
1-Water extraction ----->fiter. 2-Basify ----> filter
. 3-Add freebase to acetone. 4-Gas with HCl.
|
prickleberry Member |
posted 10-04-1999 08:10 AM
You can add more steps if this isn't pure enough for you, like
recrystalise.
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 10-05-1999 02:39 AM
Thanks Prickleberry and all.Will certainly try your method
The bipolar thingy has caused me lots of grief.I have been able to reduce
it but not completely eradicate it
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-05-1999 03:13 PM
dilution is the key...
the soap is isolated in concentrated solution it is not sucked of
though a high percent of goods may be caught in the soap
then it is dried and then a bunch of solution is added, the trick is to
keep layering it so it cant rise as it gets stuck
you will see this is only one contaminant causing XTYL problem it is
easy to see the contaminant this soap>>>>means no problem
the microcellulose can be caused to plane like a compass point and it
will filter upside down tho the ellectro is supperior for removing this as
at superpotential the product acts as slush in solution
repeated ellectrocrystalizations will rid this compleatly of
microcelluloses
1 soap 2 microcellulose 3 metaloids 4 waste of
crystalization 5 si or dirt 6 wax 7 binder 8 buffer pH 9 i
dont see anything else comong through it is pure and clean 10 Iodine is
ellectro gasses
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 10-05-1999 09:07 PM
Well, everybody gets their favorite way going and more power to them:
I have not had the honor to meet sodium laurel sulphate, so my advice
is somewhat  spurious
and uneducated.
Worlock's advice about coldness is something I would try. It's easy to
put in the freezer and see what happens: it's been known to coalesce some
other evil additives.
Further, and this is true for several OTC's I've experimented with:
do not use water, use alcohols for the original grinding and mixing and
basifying etc.
Alcohols have a quality of not being subject to bufferring actions like
water: I think that several of the additives depend greatly on ionic
combinations with the water to entrain or otherwise mess with the
extraction.
Mixed alcohols and xylene are my preferred two solvents: and they HAVE
to go in the freezer to differentiate.
Maybe alky's and colemen's would work too.
Do not overlook the Fman's references to electroseparation: supported
by the Stonium(kiss!) contribution about it's usage in electrophoresis.
Please try the non-water and freezer method on a sample: I'd be really
interested in the result.
Thanks, dwarfer
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 10-05-1999 09:10 PM
Geeze, Prickleberry: if you do not think you have a use for the sandtrap
don't use it!
But it is not a stupid idea for some who have tried it.
dwarfer
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-05-1999 10:15 PM
Needless not to say that a buffering agent is totaly useless at the
voltage of say 12v this creates an overpotential and any buffering agent
is buffered infinatly???
Anyways the buffer agent you need to work about causes a contact
explosive when ya try to clean the product of iodine with sodium
thiosulphate and then give it ammoni or something like the ammine
Then mysterious fires start in the night in the stash baggie real cool
hugh????
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 10-05-1999 11:22 PM
Since sodium lauryl sulphate is a pretty large molecule:
CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2-SO4-Na
I would try to get rid of the Na, at least, to destroy this molecule's
ability to dissolve in water. With the orginal pills I would acid
treat them with HCl, and wash with toluene, or a high weight alcohol
non-miscible with water. The HCl treatment would do one of two things:
C12H25-SO4-Na + HCl --> C12H25-SO4-H + NaCl
Or
C12H25-SO4-Na + HCl + H-OH --> C12H25-OH + NaCl + H-SO4-H
I beleive that C12H25-SO4-H and lauryl alcohol are both insouble in
water.
Does everything look in order?
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 10-06-1999 06:56 AM
Thanks to all for contributions.Yes Dwarfer you are right.Did a Worlockian
acetone wash,and then dissolved in methanol.Cooled in the fridge and then
vacuum filtered.Basified to 12 eventually,and added solvent.This is the
cleanest ive ever had.no more suds.Just a whole heap of sludge caught in
the buchner.The methanol works brilliant,and so does the preliminary
acetone wash. Prickleberry I believe your method works to , and I
intend on trying it.Thanks for your input also.I suggest you try this way
as well. The method I think I will try for now is ; grind em up,hot
acetone wash,dissolve in methanol,cool in the fridge,vaccuum buchner,then
sand filter and evaporate for hopefully super clean E HCl..Any
thoughts? FMAN thanks for your input I have a lot to learn yet about
the electro stuff,but respect its validity.Thanks all
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 10-06-1999 07:11 AM
Chemguy you have proposed a very worthy idea react the thing at the
beginning and dispose of its water solubility.I will try this as well
and will post results.I find beating these obstacles more of a thrill and
learning experience than producing any drug which
I have never done
Do
you think heating or reflux would be necessary?
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-06-1999 09:18 PM
The soap may prove to be a use full agent in ellectro processing, I find
it hard to belive yoall would even hesitate to form the salt through the
ellectro, all the steps are there it really dont even need filtering or
nothing, just divided ellectro control of evacuate gass and collection an
dmixxing etcetcetc, I learn long time ago making hash and such goods that
solvent really gots a lame conclusion and the methods are like historicial
this is what I will leave a history of the method you must master the
thing and pass on what ya found this I am finnishing up fell accomplished
in the pass and the future awaits new discovery, good luck all God
Bless ---A010---
|
FMAN Member |
posted 10-06-1999 09:22 PM
Producing drugs for legitimat treatment is not wrong nor illegal if you go
about it propperly, try busting the inhaler open and running through
ellectro youll end up with Hydroxide amphetamine salt the free base?
Anyways repeated ellectroXTYLazations will purify your product as well
as influence it permenant structure such as oxidation and reduction, it
will work U can be shure after ya have mastered the thing it will work
very well for all kinds of reactions and purifications.
This is the last phase of my commiunication efforts...
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 10-07-1999 07:54 AM
Dwarfer twas a great dream The methanol pull first sorted it all
out.Acetone certainly dissolves wax but I will still do the water
pull .This worked far better than starting with water like the
manufacturers wanted you to .Thanx to all
|
Uncle
Fester Junior
Member |
posted 10-08-1999 08:54 PM
The method I have come to like in dealing with fucked up shit pills is
basically this. Grind pills in blender. Take ground pill mass and add a
saturated solutionof NaOH in methanol to it until a light paste is
achieved. This is lye dissolved in HEET gasline deicer. Grind a bit more
for 20 minutes to freebase. Add Coleman Camper fuel to mix, about 2 ml per
pill, maybe less, stir for 15 minutes, filter. Add more Coleman Camper
fuel to pill mass and stir some more, filter. This gives a naptha solution
of free base. It can then be bubbled with HCl to give hydrochloride, or
added to liquid ammonia for lithium reduction. If electric reduction is to
be done with this material, the HCl salt after thorough drying should be
added to a little water, then free based and extracted with toluene. The
toluene extract is then bubbled with HCl to give very pure extract.
|
prickleberry Member |
posted 10-08-1999 11:54 PM
Dwarfer; If sand filter works for you , great. But filter paper works fine
for me. We'll haveto agree to differ on this one....big deal !!
PS...Hows the electro dwarfer/fester bomb going? I don't think I could
have possibly chosen a worse reduction method if I tried !! Ever heard of
the easy way ?? Prickleberry over and out..
|
CHEMMAN Member |
posted 10-09-1999 11:14 PM
Thanx fester.Is this the method on your video. I am waiting on its
arrival.Does this deal with guifenasin??
|
Uncle
Fester Junior
Member |
posted 10-10-1999 02:01 PM
It certainly does deal effectively with guifenesin. That's the reason why
Coleman Camper Fuel was used as extractant. It doesn't dissolve
guifenesin.
|
The
Alchemist Member
|
posted 10-10-1999 03:01 PM
What about dissolving guaifenessin w/ chloroform? Merck lists that
chloroform will dissolve guaifenessin but NOT ephedrine•HCl. Would washing
pills w/ chloroform, filter, wash with cold dH2O, filter then evaporate
the water give nice ephedrine•HCl crystals?
peace out...
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 10-10-1999 07:55 PM
UF, your technique is one I have quacked like a duck about for a while:
your weight may well cause some to give it a go.
The only thing I would say is that I have not found it necessary to use
methanol: the mixed alcohols from the hardware store seem to work fine.
The blender beats the hell out of dry grinding: separation of MCC can
be effected by the sand trap that Prickleberry abhors: or as you said you
can go ahead and saturate the alcohol with NaOH.
However, being the lazy guy I am I usually just more or less hang the
pH sensor in the corner while the blender is on low, and add NaOH prill by
prill until I get to 12 or 13: and then add an excess of NP and separate.
I have used xylene, and separate in the freezer, and find a lot of
other gunk (like povidone) agglomerating under the influence of coldness.
However, the Coleman's might do similarly, and with the advantage of
discriminating against the guaifenesin,
========================
A friend of mine and I were discoursing about the use of charcoal
lighter fluid the other day. I hypothesized that charcoal lighter fluids
would have no reason not to include lighter parafin waxes in their blend:
whereas Coleman's and similar would not include them because of the
possibility of clogging the small orifices of some of the types of stoves
that use them.
===============================
Prickleberry, I have done no illegal acts for several weeks due to
local circumstances.
However, although you disparage the electro way, UF's seminal posting
(actually the TRUE 1st interest posting was in ADC 2 years ago with the Hg
cathode)
you will see it rise again like a Phx from the ashes of disdain.
The Lone Ranger presurized technique is pretty simple, and as good as
the ZnCl2 as far as quality, which is better than the best glacial acetic
technique that I have done at least:
but Chem Guy's Urushibara appears to me to be waiting for me to get
back in action: which is both a surprise and a disappointment to me, it
being so damn simple in concept anyway.
Maybe I'm missing something.
=====================
UF, you wre apparently "out of action" on vacation or something
when I posted greetings to you from an old friend.
\/\/AR]-[AMMER sends his regards!
dwarfer
|
prickleberry Member |
posted 10-11-1999 09:23 AM
Greetings dwarfer, prickleberry is pleased to see you still promoting your
sand filter. Its good that you weren't discouraged by my last posting,
which sounded over critical upon later reading. Do you have an endless
supply of ephedrine or something ?? Or are you doing a thesis on all the
possible reduction methods under the sun.Well, heres another benzyl
alcohol reduction you may not have heard of. -Tin reduction of
pseudoephedrine, Generally, add SnCl2 to some dry ether. then some NaBH4
to reduce it back to elemental tin, after ten minutes add your
chloro-pseudoephedrine and stir for 12 hours, extract by filtering then by
usual A/B extraction methods. Yields methamphetamine in about the 75-80%
range from the chloro step.
LONG LIVE UNCLE FESTER !!! Is this the real uncle fester ?? If it is
then g'day from Prickleberry. I love your work !!
|